ⓘ  Welcome to the beta version of the new APSC website.

Portfolio Budget Statements key performance indicators 2016-17

Contents

The foregoing sections describe the performance activities and measures the Commission engaged in during 2016–17 under the goals set out in the Corporate Plan.

The following are the results for three key performance indicators in the PBS 2016–17 that were not accommodated through the Corporate Plan.

Program 1.1

Measure: Degree of satisfaction of the Minister, heads of entities and other clients, as expressed through feedback about the quality and timeliness of services and advice provided by the Commission.

Result: Very good.

Measure: Number of reviews, excluding promotion reviews, finalised on behalf of the Merit Protection Commissioner. [Note that the Merit Protection Commissioner’s annual report discusses the performance of the review function against timeliness targets and measures taken to respond to challenges in meeting targets.]

Result: One hundred and eighty-five.

Measure: Percentage of reviews conducted on behalf of the Merit Protection Commissioner completed within published timeframes. [Note that this too is discussed in the Merit Protection Commissioner’s report.]

Result: Ninety-one per cent.

Program 1.2

Measure: Meet all requirements for the budgeting and reporting of parliamentarians’ and judicial office holders’ remuneration and entitlements.

Result: Achieved.

Was this page helpful?

Acknowledgement of Country

The APSC acknowledges the Traditional Custodians of Country throughout Australia and recognises the continuing connection to lands, waters and communities. We pay our respect to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures and to Elders both past and present.