List of tables
- Table 2.1 Ongoing employees by classification, 1994, 2007 and 2008
- Table 2.2 Employee identified type of work by classification, 2007–08
- Table 2.3 Ongoing employees—proportion by age, 1996 to 2008
- Table 2.4 Separations of ongoing employees by age group, 2006–07 and 2007–08
- Table 2.5 Ongoing SES employees by age group, sex and level, June 2008
- Table 3.1 Representation of EEO groups among ongoing employees, 1999 to 2008
- Table 3.2 Agencies with the highest proportion of ongoing Indigenous employees, June 2008
- Table 3.3 Representation of ongoing Indigenous employees by classification, 1999, 2007 and 2008
- Table 3.4 Indigenous representation in engagements and separations of ongoing employees, 1998–99 to 2007–08
- Table 3.5 Agency measures used to recruit and/or retain Indigenous Australians, 2007–08
- Table 3.6 Agency attraction attributes—importance and how well expectations were met by Indigenous status, 2007–08
- Table 3.7 Representation of employees with disability in engagements and separations of ongoing employees, 1998–99 to 2007–08
- Table 3.8 Agency initiatives to improve access to employment for people with disability, 2007–08
- Table 3.9 Agency initiatives to improve support both to employees with disability and managers of employees with disability, 2007–08
- Table 3.10 Agency attraction attributes—importance and how well expectations were met by disability status, 2007–08
- Table 3.11 Agency attraction attributes—importance and how well expectations were met by non-English speaking background status, 2007–08
- Table 3.12 Agency attraction attributes—importance and how well expectations were met by age group, 2007–08
4. Attracting, engaging and retaining the APS workforce
- Table 4.1 Relevant employees’ views on recruitment experience, 2006–07 and 2007–08
- Table 4.2 Attributes attracting employees to their current job, 2007–08
- Table 4.3 Agency attributes—employees’ expectations well met, 2007–08
- Table 4.4 Reasons for rejoining the APS
- Table 4.5 Job satisfaction—employees’ most important workplace attributes, 2006–07 and 2007–08
- Table 4.6 Job satisfaction by a range of groups, 2006–07 and 2007–08
- Table 4.7 Total remuneration package, 2007 (% change on the previous year)
- Table 4.8 Comparisons of wages growth, 2000–01 to 2007–08
- Table 4.9 Comparative levels of total remuneration package, 2007
- Table 4.10 Median remuneration by gender and classification, June 2007
- Table 4.11 Median length of service (years) at classification level, June 2007
5. Leadership, learning and development in the APS
- Table 5.1 Satisfaction/agreement with questions comprising the Senior Leaders factor, 2007–08
- Table 5.2 Agencies’ anticipated learning and development priorities for employees, 2008–09
- Table 5.3 Satisfaction/agreement with questions comprising the Learning and Development factor, 2007–08
- Table 5.4 Relevant agencies’ expenditure on formal off-the-job learning and development as a percentage of departmental operating expenses, by agency size, 2004–05 and 2007–08
6. Increasing APS efficiency and effectiveness
- Table 6.1 Most common actions already taken by relevant agencies to respond to additional 2% efficiency dividend by agency size, 2007–08
- Table 6.2 Employee views on areas as ‘important’ to improve or maintain productivity in the next 12 months, 2007–08
- Table 6.3 Satisfaction/agreement with questions comprising the Immediate Manager factor, 2007–08
- Table 6.4 Level of workplace absence by agency, 2007–08
- Table 6.5 Views on selected employee engagement attributes and level of unscheduled absence in agency, 2007–08
- Table 6.6 Sick leave levels for selected jurisdictions, 2006–07 and 2007–08
- Table 6.7 Strategies used to manage workplace absence by agency size, 2007–08
- Table 6.8 Actions taken by agencies to manage employees’ levels of annual leave by agency size, 2007–08
- Table 7.1 Measures used by agencies in performance assessments to ensure employees demonstrate and consistently apply the Values, 2002–03 to 2007–08
- Table 7.2 Agency use of mechanisms to promote awareness among employees about how they can report suspected misconduct (including harassment and bullying) during 2007–08
- Table 7.3 Measures accounting for Code of Conduct investigations, 2006–07 and 2007–08
- Table 7.4 Elements of the Code suspected of being breached in investigations finalised during 2007–08
- Table 7.5 Number of employees by types of misconduct in investigations finalised during 2007–08
- Table 7.6 Outcomes of finalised investigations into suspected breaches of the Code, 2007–08
- Table 7.7 Person(s) authorised to receive whistleblower reports, 2007–08
- Table 7.8: Employees’ perceptions of whether their agency routinely applies merit (as defined in the Public Service Act) in decisions regarding engagement and promotion resulting from a competitive selection process, 2003–04 to 2007–08
8. Interactions with Ministers and the Parliament
- Table 8.1 Types of matters upon which relevant APS employees came into direct contact with Ministers and/or their advisers, 2003–04, 2004–05, 2007–08
- Table 8.2 Total Government personal staff and numbers of ministerial advisers, 1995–2008
- Table 8.3 Agency quality control measures, 2003–04, 2004–05 and 2007–08
- Table 8.4 Employees’ awareness of quality control measures, 2003–04, 2004–05 and 2007–08
- Table 8.5 Agency recordkeeping protocols, 2003–04, 2004–05 and 2007–08
- Table 8.6 Employees’ awareness of recordkeeping protocols, 2003–04, 2004–05 and 2007–08
- Table 8.7 Proportions of agencies with formal evaluation measures in place, 2003–04, 2004–05 and 2007–08
- Table 8.8: Agency processes for resolving concerns with ministerial offices, 2003–04, 2004–05 and 2007–08
- Table 8.9 Employees’ awareness of processes for resolving concerns with ministerial offices, 2003–04, 2004–05 and 2007–08
- Table 8.10 Summary of agencies’ five most important strategies for strengthening relations with Ministers and their offices, 2007–08
- Table 8.11 Attendance at parliamentary accountability training courses, 2005–06 to 2007–08
- Table 8.12 Proportion of SES and EL staff who have received formal training in accountabilities, rights and responsibilities to Parliament, 2005 and 2008
10: Working with government agencies and stakeholders
- Table 10.1 Continuum of relationships
- Table 10.2 Estimated devolved government expenditure
- Table 10.3 Agency and employee survey results for agency protocols/policies dealing with external stakeholders, 2007–08
- Table 10.4 Interactions with government agencies, 2006–07 and 2007–08
- Table 10.5 Employee interaction with non-government stakeholders (All APS), 2006–07 and 2007–08
- Table 10.6 Employee interaction with non-government stakeholders (EL/SES), 2006–07 and 2007–08
List of figures
A MS Excel file containing the data for all figures used in the Report is available here.
- Figure 2.1 APS employees, 1989 to 2008
- Figure 2.2 Non-ongoing employees as a proportion of total employees, 1994 to 2008
- Figure 2.3 Total employees by sex, 1994 to 2008
- Figure 2.4 Proportion of ongoing employees working part-time by sex, 1994 to 2008
- Figure 2.5 Proportion of ongoing employees working part-time by age group and sex, June 2008
- Figure 2.6 Ongoing employees by classification and sex, June 2008
- Figure 2.7 Change in the number of women at selected classifications, weighted and indexed, 1994 to 2008
- Figure 2.8 Ongoing employees—engagement and promotion rates for women, 2007–08
- Figure 2.9 Ongoing employees—promotion and transfer rates between agencies, 1998–99 to 2007–08
- Figure 2.10 Actual and projected age profile for the APS, 2007, 2017 and 2022
- Figure 2.11 Ongoing employees—length of service, 1994 to 2008
- Figure 2.12: Ongoing employees by classification and location, June 2008
- Figure 2.13 Ongoing engagement and separation rates, 1993–94 to 2007–08
- Figure 2.14 Ongoing engagements by classification, 1993–94 to 2007–08
- Figure 2.15 Ongoing engagements by age group, 1993–94 to 2007–08
- Figure 2.16 Ongoing separations, 1993–94 to 2007–08
- Figure 3.1 Representation of Indigenous employees in agencies with more than 1000 ongoing employees, June 2008
- Figure 3.2 Employee satisfaction with factors identified through factor analysis—Indigenous employees and non-Indigenous employees, 2007–08
- Figure 3.3 Representation of ongoing employees with disability, by classification, 1999 to 2008
- Figure 3.4 Representation of employees with disability in agencies with more than 1000 ongoing employees, June 2008
- Figure 3.5 Employee satisfaction with factors identified through factor analysis—employees with disability and employees without disability, 2007–08
- Figure 3.6 Representation of NESB1 employees in agencies with more than 1000 ongoing employees, June 2008
- Figure 3.7 Employee satisfaction with factors identified through factor analysis—employees from non-English speaking backgrounds and employees not from non-English speaking backgrounds, 2007–08
- Figure 3.8 Employee satisfaction with factors identified through factor analysis—young employees (under 25 years), mature-aged employees (45 to 54 years) and older workers (55 years and over), 2007–08
4. Attracting, engaging and retaining the APS workforce
- Figure 4.1 Agencies’ progress with formal workforce planning, 2002–03 to 2007–08
- Figure 4.2 Skills shortages and their impact on agency capability, 2006–07 and 2007–08
- Figure 4.3 Length of recruitment processes, 2007–08
- Figure 4.4 Employee satisfaction with each of the 12 employee engagement factors, 2007–08
- Figure 4.5 Gap between the minimum and maximum of salary ranges, 1996 and 2007
5. Leadership, learning and development in the APS
- Figure 5.1 Proportion of employees who rated their immediate supervisor as ‘high’ on leadership capabilities, 2002–03, 2004–05, 2006–07 and 2007–08
- Figure 5.2 SES and EL 2 views about leadership in their agency, 2007–08
- Figure 5.3 Leadership development activities offered by agencies, 2007–08
- Figure 5.4 Methods agencies use to identify future leaders, 2007–08
- Figure 5.5 Measures used to align learning and development to organisational business goals, 2002–03, 2004–05 and 2007–08
6. Increasing APS efficiency and effectiveness
- Figure 6.1 Employees’ who rated area as ‘important’ in improving or maintaining their productivity by level of agreement with agency performance in last 12 months, 2007–08
- Figure 6.2 SES and EL 2 views about what actions would increase efficiency and/or effectiveness in their agency, 2006–07 and 2007–08
- Figure 7.1 Agency use of induction programmes, 2007–08
8. Interactions with Ministers and the Parliament
- Figure 8.1 Selected agency measures to ensure SES staff understand their rights and responsibilities in relation to parliamentary accountability, 2002–03, 2003–04, 2004–05 and 2007–08
- Figure 9.1 Recordkeeping measures used by agencies, 2006–07 and 2007–08
- Figure 9.2 Agency recordkeeping practices to store corporate emails, 2005–06 to 2007–08
- Figure 9.3 Measures used by agencies to raise employee awareness of conflict of interest obligations, 2003-04 to 2007–08
10: Working with government agencies and stakeholders
- Figure 10.1 Agency consultation on different government activities with external stakeholders (usually or sometimes), 2007–08
- Figure 10.2 Extent and type of agency involvement with external stakeholders, 2007–08
- Figure 10.3 Proportion of relevant APS employees(a) involved in different types of interactions with external stakeholders, 2007–08
11: Inclusive and innovative government
- Figure 11.1 Use of feedback mechanisms to obtain information from the public—relevant agencies, 2007–08
- Figure 11.2 Use of feedback collected from the public—relevant agencies, 2007–08
- Figure 11.3 Factor analysis on innovation in the APS, 2007–08
- Figure 11.4 Employees’ views on innovation at work, 2007–08
- Figure 11.5 Chance to be creative and innovative, 2007-08
- Figure 11.6 Relationship between effective communication in an agency and level of encouragement of innovation, 2007-08
